Wednesday, 30 January 2008

$10 Billion Darkness:Obasanjo’s Expensive Gift To Nigerians

By Ugochukwu Ejinkeonye
 
This is an example of a country that has fallen down; it has collapsed. This house has fallen Chinua Achebe
 
I never for once hid my deep-seated conviction that little or no governance took place in Nigeria throughout the eight dark years of protracted nightmare that former President Olusegun Obasanjo encumbered the ground as Nigeria’s most flamboyant pretender on the throne. The only thing that has continued to pain me is that the man he carefully selected and imposed on the nation through a phantom election is unwilling or afraid (or both) to probe his regime and prove me wrong.
 
 Nigerians would recall that I never ceased raising the alarm in this column that our country, in the hands of Obasanjo, was simply a decaying, rickety, old truck, severely vandalized and abandoned on the roadside, and resented by even the fellow that claims to be its driver. I wrote a number of essays in this column with these captions: A Nation Not Governed,” “Nigeria: The High Cost Of Neglect,” “Still An Abandoned Project”, “No doubt, This House Has Collapsed,” “Waiting For Our Unprofitable Servants,” and some others, saying and emphasizing just the same thing.
 
I had insisted on this page, that very soon, Nigerians would begin to face the grim reality of the cruel neglect to which their country was subjected by a ruler who was not sincere enough to tell his countrymen that, actually, he neither meant well for anybody nor had any clear idea about how Nigeria could be steered out of the woods. Almost everyday now, hideous facts emerge to prove that I had even understated the matter. But am I happy that I have been vindicated? No, I am very sad, and my heart bleeds, because my beloved country, with every potential for greatness and mass prosperity, has for many years now been visited with the worst form of cruelty and plunder by men and women without any bit of conscience and compassion. I only wish they would just let go, quit the stage, and allow men of conscience and vision to come on board to commence the process of reclamation. 
 
Before the gang of Nigeria-haters led by the “evil genius” in Minna, Gen Ibrahim Babangida, conspired with Gen Theophilous Damjuma and some other incredibly wealthy generals and politicians to inflict Obasanjo on the nation, the governments we had had in Nigeria had managed to invest modest efforts to, at least, under-perform and under-achieve. But when Obasanjo came in, he simply decided that the best way to “move Nigeria forward” was just to sit by and watch it decay, while he did well for himself to become, in the estimation of former Governor Orji Uzor Kalu of Abia State and some other people, one of the richest billionaires in Africa.
 
His was such an unserious government, without any purpose, clear-cut direction, and even the tiniest hint of concern and/or determination to change anything in Nigeria. Each time the Nigerian Television Authority (NTA) beamed the offensive images of the “Obasanjo boys and girls” at their so-called Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting, what one usually saw was a gaggle of palpably unserious men and women, holding hands, laughing with reckless abandon, clowning, backslapping, tickling and hugging each other, and generally having a jolly good time in a most vulgar and obscene fashion. In fact, anyone who mistook those footages for images of a riotous party of some gin-soaked high school delinquents should be forgiven. On a particular day, VANGUARD Newspaper published on its front-page the picture of a male and female member of that incestuous Cabinet holding one another in a highly suggestive, most irresponsible, and compromising manner that alerted the nation to the quality of minds that converge for that clearly unproductive meeting every Wednesday. Also, another picture was published where the Baba himself was dutifully adjusting the headgear of a particular minister while she waited patiently, with her face radiating with rapture and ecstasy.
 
There could be more horribly obscene scenes that may have escaped the lenses of the photojournalists. Indeed, there was just no way anything good could have come out of such a enclave of boundless frivolity, where all those merry light-minded fellows gathered for fun-filled and obviously lust-soaked FEC sessions. It is therefore not surprising that the regime was a huge failure, except, that many who had starred in it had also done well for themselves, like their jolly old boss. The only loser is, of course, the nation, which was left in terrible ruins after eight years of noisy unproductivity and grand advertisement of visionlessness and incompetence.
 
Following the horrible, unnamable scandal which hit the Obasanjo family recently, a newsmagazine had gone to town last week with a detailed report on the kind of nauseating relationship that flourished between Obasanjo and the many women that worked under him in the unmissed, God-forsaken, “woman-friendly” regime. It was a very disgusting report, which every decent mind would hope were not true. But assuming the lurid details presented there were true, how could any productive venture had taken place under such an ungodly environment?
 
Well, thank God, the nightmare is over, even though, we now have as our leader a man whose direction and purpose are yet to become clear to anyone, even, perhaps, himself. What might happen in the next few days and weeks, if you ask me, is that the tremor which hit the Obasanjo family following his son, Gbenga’s grave allegations may replicate in various degrees in the several homes of the ladies that had worked in the last regime. I can imagine many jealous husbands looking their wives in the face and asking: tell me the truth, darling, were you involved? So, disgusting.
 
An opportunity once presented itself for me to know the feeling of some of the characters in the now expired circus show in Aso Rock towards my articles when one of the most passionate defenders and promoters of the failed regime, Mrs. Obiagaeli Ezekwesili, then Education Minister, came to Independent. When we met, she looked me in the face and called me “the angry man.” Indeed, the point she was trying to pass across did not elude me. I saw her remark as an indirect way of informing me that they had already classified me as just another “angry Nigerian”, and so nothing I wrote could move them.
 
Now, Mrs. Ezekwesili is working for the World Bank, and it was probably not a coincidence that President Umar Musa Yar’Adua would choose the occasion of her recent visit to Nigeria to tell the nation that Obasanjo, under whom she had served as “Madam Due Process” and Education Minister, had squandered the nation’s $10 billion while pretending to fix the power sector, yet Nigerians are still trapped in an impenetrable, choking darkness.  Of course, that was a nice way of telling “Madam Due Process” to her very face that she was also guilty, having failed to raise any finger to check that kind of mindless squander-mania and prodigality right under her nose. 
 
The deepening crises in the power sector regularly reminds me of how Mr. Liyel Imoke, the current Governor of Cross River State, had, while he was Obasanjo’s Minister of Power and Steel, raised the people’s hope and callously dashed it. Imoke had gathered some journalists somewhere and gleefully showed them video clips of the “wonderful achievements” he had recorded in the power sector. It sounded too good to be true. He had proudly announced that the nation would soon even have more megawatts than it needed, just within a few months. He showed the power plants he was building, and announced the dates many of them would be commissioned to the delight of his listeners. But nobody in that gathering suspected that Imoke was involved in mere film tricks, to waste everybody’s time.
 
 Yes, Obasanjo had actually commissioned those “power plants,” but what the nation eventually saw were mere deadwoods, that only occupied spaces here and there. What we now hear is that the Balogun Owu had commissioned uncompleted projects. I will still return to this subject, for a more detailed treatment, because it pains me so much that Imoke had deceived  his audience and the nation on this very important subject that touches the very life of Nigerians. Indeed, instead of anyone noticing any improvement in the power sector due to the Imoke/Obasanjo power plants, the deterioration that has set in has become even worse.
 
Where is Imoke’s targeted 10,000 megawatts, which, going by the dates he had announced, the nation would have got by now? Could it be that the contracts for the construction of the power plants were given to people with no proven experience in the area for reasons that are less than patriotic?
 
Not too long ago, we heard that Ms. Iyabo Obasanjo-Bello, Obasanjo’s first(?) daughter, and her Austrian friends were given contracts to build power plants, even when it was clear they had no previous experience in that sector.  Well, as everyone now knows, the whole thing ended so sordidly, with each party in the grand perfidy against the nation, spilling the bin against the other, with Nigeria, of course, being the ultimate loser. Who cares?  Why are these people always treating their fellow citizens like lesser beings, just because they are in power? Why?
 
Indeed, only a thorough probe can tell the nation why Obasanjo had used the intimidating sum of $10 billion to purchase for Nigerians thicker and more suffocating darkness than they have ever experienced. The manufacturing sector in Nigeria is under serious threat. Many companies have closed down due to the high cost of doing business here, occasioned by the equally high cost of purchasing diesel to run countless generators.
 
Any probe that fails to unearth how U$10 billion could only purchase us darkness instead power supply that would have illuminated our lives would be useless. Totally useless! Indeed, all those implicated in this scam must be brought to book before all Nigerians whom they had cheated and severely traumatized.
 
========================================
 
scruples2006@yahoo.com
www.ugochukwu.wordpress.com
Posted by Ugochukwu Ejinkeonye at 10:59:15 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Thursday, 24 January 2008

Another One Bites Dust In Enugu!

By Ugochukwu Ejinkeonye

When the Managing Editor of the Independent, Mr. Akpandem James, informed me in the afternoon of last Friday (January 18, 2008) that the Enugu State Governor, Mr. Sullivan Chime, had just been ordered to vacate his seat by the Election Petitions Tribunal sitting in the Coal City, I was glad that another solid evidence had emerged to strengthen the position of many of us who have continued to insist that what former President Olusegun Obasanjo and his fellow expert and partner in political corruption, Prof Maurice Iwu, supervised in Nigeria last April was the worst election in human history.

 
Of course, we know that Mr. Chime’s case would not be the last in this determined effort by the judiciary to dismantle the irredeemably corrupt edifices brazenly erected across the nation by Obasanjo and his equally murky-minded collaborators in the inappropriately named Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). Already, the clouds appear to be gathering over Ibadan, the Oyo State capital, for instance, ahead of the February ruling in the governorship tussle in the state, as an anxious nation awaits new surprises from that famous land where self-celebrated masters of thuggery, violence and electoral corruption now hold sway. In fact, I would be really surprised if the PDP would be able to retain up to six governorship seats by the time the Election Tribunals conclude their assignment.
 
Reading the judgment in Enugu last week, the Tribunal Chairman, Mr. Justice Samuel Ottah, stated that the Tribunal was of the view that “instances of non-compliance with the Electoral Act, which is non-voting by majority of the electorate, goes to the foundation and [so] it cannot be said that there have been an election. It goes to the root of the edifice. We have no doubt that majority of the electorate were denied the right to choose their governor. The governorship election in Enugu State of 14th and 28th April 2007 is hereby declared a nullity and therefore void. The election of the first respondent, Mr. Sullivan Chime, is hereby declared invalid as he was not duly elected and returned.”
 
As the voice of the Tribunal Chairman reverberated in Enugu that morning, and around the nation as the day wore on, there is no doubt that most people may have sadly remembered one misguided young man from Enugu State called Mr. Frank Nweke, former Information Minister and Obasanjo’s Chief Megaphone, and may have wondered where he was hiding when the tissue of lies he had laboured so hard to string together in respect of the elections in Enugu were being shredded by the Tribunal.
 
When the charade which the Tribunal has rightly described as “make-believe or fairy tales” took place in April 2007, former Senate President, Mr. Ken Nnamani, had against all odds, come out to clearly declare that there were no elections in Enugu. And for this effrontery, Nnamani was rewarded with virulent attacks and several forms of intimidation from the Emperor’s foot soldiers, but the man remained undaunted. Frank Nweke himself, seeking to please his master who was diligently overseeing the allocation of votes across the nation from his fortress in Aso Rock, had loudly insisted that, contrary to Senator Nnamani’s claims, proper elections, conducted in transparent and orderly manner, took place all over Enugu, even though some people were ready to bet their last kobo that even Nweke’s father did note vote in the so called elections. 
 
What the Tribunal has now confirmed is what everyone already knew took place, and which Senator Nnamani and several other right-thinking people in Enugu State had at that time declared without equivocation, namely, that some licensed fellows had merely gathered somewhere and allocated votes to “approved” candidates, who were later declared “winners’ of elections that never took place. It was a most unfortunate and very saddening development. In fact, I am hoping that in the days to come, all those who had contested the April 14 and 28 elections in Enugu State would go to court to seek further interpretations and the full implications of the ruling. Because, if you ask me, the Tribunal has simply ordered a rerun of all the elections that took place in Enugu State on those two days, implying also in clear and unambiguous terms that the “results” which gave President Umar Yar’Adua and all the lawmakers from Enugu State their “victories” had emerged from phantom elections. 
 
Mixed reactions have trailed what can be rightly termed Gov Chime’s “Second Fall.” The “First” occurred a couple of days earlier, on Tuesday, January 15, 2008, when the Enugu governor slumped and passed out during the Armed Forces Remembrance Day celebrations at Michael Okpara Square, Enugu. It is possible that Chime may have been overwhelmed by fear and dread of the predictable fate that awaited him four days later at the Tribunal, causing his strength and courage to fail him.
 
Well, take heart, brother; you should have known that there was no way the corrupt electoral edifices erected by Obasanjo and his likeminds could have survived in today’s Nigeria, where the judiciary is fast rediscovering itself, and the people gradually developing some sophistication and discrimination in taste as far as politics and democracy are concerned. 
 

The Tribunal had also ordered the Independent Electoral Commission (INEC) to conduct fresh governorship elections in Enugu State within three months. The same order had also earlier been given in respect of the annulled governorship elections in Adamawa, Kogi and Kebbi States, all now before the Appeal Tribunal, where Chime and his lawyers would be heading to any moment from now (if they had not done so already). In fact, many other electoral “victories” in both State and National Assemblies have equally been annulled. And many more would be annulled in the days to come.

 

So, in the face of these ugly developments which have tarnished Independent Electoral Commission (INEC) and its Chairman beyond redemption, who then would conduct the fresh elections if the Appeal Tribunal begins to uphold some of the judgments already delivered by the lower courts? Would it still be the same thoroughly discredited INEC headed by the same Professor Maurice Iwu which had in April 2007 conducted elections in Nigeria that have now clearly acquitted itself as, perhaps, the worst in human history?

 

What would give the other political parties the confidence that this same INEC would now conduct transparent, free and fair elections, when Nigerians are yet to see the slightest hint of remorse in its Chairman over the revolting electoral fraud the Commission unabashedly and flamboyantly perpetrated in this part of the world just a few months ago? Assuming the other parties insist that they would not be able to repose any confidence in this INEC and its unrepentant Chairman, and so would not participate in the fresh elections it would conduct, would President Umar Yar’Adua hold the nation to ransom simply because he is afraid of the political cost of sacking just one man that is held in fierce contempt by most Nigerians and even foreigners? What would Yar’Adua do about Iwu and INEC? Would he be able to summon the guts to also dispatch him to Kuru to join his cousin Nuhu Ribadu to rue their misfortune for agreeing to become willing and eager hands for the prosecution of Obasanjo’s insidious designs?

 

Honestly, I don’t envy Yar’Adua. Iwu and his INEC are two most embarrassing and imposing mountains standing before him, which he has so far successfully avoided confronting despite widespread sentiments against the man and the horrible elections he supervised. But as these damning verdicts continue to emerge from different Election Tribunals across the nation, the disbandment of the present INEC and the sacking and prosecuting of Prof Iwu for taking the nation through a very costly stress and the serious doubts over his management of resources at INEC are   assuming lives of their own and cannot just be easily wished away.

 

It is possible that as usual, the Servant-Leader is even unperturbed and merely sleeping through the matter, hoping that like many horrible things that have happened in Nigeria, it would, somehow, disappear. But as he would find out very soon, the serious issues Nigerians have against Iwu and NEC won’t be in a hurry to disappear, because they represent an affront Nigerians are now ready to confront squarely. Iwu is even compounding matters and still inflaming passions by his unrepentant attitude and brazen insistence that the elections he conducted were the best Nigeria ever had. What a gratuitous insult. 

 
It is strange that instead of worrying about the horrible corruption charges against their godfather, the supporters of former Governor Chimaroke Nnamani are out there rejoicing and threatening to deny Chime the PDP ticket if the Appeal Tribunal upholds last Friday’s judgment that sacked him from office. Sullivan Chime is a likable person, but Enugu under his watch is yet to impress me. The only thing I have written about him since he became Governor is to ask him to pay the many workers of the state parastatals some of whom are still owed more than twenty months salaries arrears, a burden he had inherited from Chimaroke who had installed him in power through the same odious phantom elections.
 
The grouse the Chimaroke group has against Chime is that he has been trying to distance himself from his predecessor in order not to be horribly tainted by his polluted legacies, which he benefited from. If Chime would take my advice, let him run now and pay with fanfare all those workers Chimaroke owed in Enugu, before the Appeal Tribunal gives him the boot. He should continue to distance himself from Chimaroke and everything he stood for, even though he had served in Chimaroke’s cabinet, and was made Governor by the Ebeano political machinery. If eventually Chimaroke, whose “election” should also be annulled if the full meaning of last week’s ruling is to be implemented, is able to make the PDP deny him their ticket, he should join another party and contest in a free and fair election, which, hopefully, would not be conducted by Maurice Iwu. Indeed, I am yet to hear of any candidate backed by civil servants who failed in an election. The Chimaroke baggage is one political liability that would sink rather than make him float.
 
But if things were to be done the way they should in a civilized society, annulling elections and calling for fresh ones should not be enough. All those who manipulated the elections should be arrested, prosecuted and dealt with accordingly. That is the only to institute deterrence in our electoral system.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

scruples2006@yahoo.com

www.ugochukwu.wordpress.com









 
Posted by Ugochukwu Ejinkeonye at 09:54:27 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Tuesday, 08 January 2008

Why I Didn’t Celebrate Christmas

 By Ugochukwu Ejinkeonye


Penultimate Tuesday was marked all over the world as ‘Christmas Day.’ But in my household, it was just another Tuesday. The reason was quite simple: I do not believe that December 25 is the birthday of our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ. In fact, what my research has shown is that, just like Easter before it, this clearly heathen feast called Christmas, rooted in hideous idolatrous observances, predates the coming of Christ to this world in human form. For several years now, therefore, I have continued to disregard Christmas. I do not even play Christmas carols. I do not give or receive Christmas cards. I may, however, receive a card, just to avoid offending or embarrassing the giver, but once he looks the other way, I throw it into the nearest dustbin.
 
The 1911 edition of Catholic Encyclopaedia states that “Christmas was not among the earliest festivals of the church … the first evidence of the feast is from Egypt.” No doubt, Christmas is one of the prominent irremediably polluted ‘children’ that emerged from the very ungodly marriage between a distorted and depreciated form of Christianity and (Roman) paganism many years after the death of the Apostles of Christ and the genuine Christians that took over from them. Although the pagan worship of the SUN god had gained prominence in several parts of the world long before the birth of Christ, and had permeated and gained wide acceptance in imperial Rome, it was Emperor Constantine’s Edict in 321 AD which ordered the unification of the mostly apostate Christians and the pagans of that period in the clearly abominable observance of the “the venerable day of the Sun” that increased the influence of Christmas Celebration in the Roman church. What has, however, become clear, judging from historical accounts is that Emperor Constantine may not have truly become a Christian.
 
My internet searches yielded an article which rehearsed what many of us already know, namely, that “25th December was celebrated in ancient days as the birthday of the unconquerable SUN god, (variously known as Tammuz, Mithra, Saturn, Adonis or BAAL) centuries before Jesus Christ was born in Bethlehem…[but] in order to win Gentile converts…the Roman Church, centuries after the Apostolic era, adopted this ancient winter festival of the SUN god and renamed it Christmas.”  And According to Alexander Hyslop, in his book, The Two Babylons (p.91), “…within the Christian Church no such festival as Christmas was ever heard of till the third century, and that not till the fourth century was far advanced did it gain much observance.” Indeed, all those who celebrate Christmas are unwittingly honouring and worshipping the devil in whose honour it had always been observed, instead of Christ, the Saviour. 
 
The SUN god was known and worshipped in ancient Babylon as the son of the “Queen of Heaven.”  Remember that God had clearly warned the backslidden Israelites of Prophet Jeremiah’s time to beware and never worship this “queen of heaven” or they would face His wrath.  And when the Israelites of that time insisted that they would go ahead to worship the queen of heaven despite God’s injunction, He pronounced a severe punishment to them.  (See Jeremiah 44: 17-27).
 
This queen of heaven, a terrible demon and enemy of God, had always sought to get the world to worship her instead of God. She had appeared under several names in several places long before Christ was born in the flesh. In Acts of Apostles, for instance, we saw her as Diana of Ephesus, which was always identified with the Greek Artemis. As little Roman Catholic children attending Catechism and Block Rosary meetings, we were told a very beautiful story of how the “queen of heaven” had appeared to little children in Fatima in 1917.
 
To be fair to this demon, and according to the Fatima story, which became the subject of a very pleasant Igbo Catholic song, she had introduced herself truly as the “queen of heaven.” I think it was some misguided and overzealous fellows that declared her to be Mary, the mother of Jesus! And since then, in other apparitions in several other places, she has been trying to act like she is Mary, thereby drawing more worshippers. You see, humans can at times teach spirits wisdom!
 
Michael Harrison, in his book, The Story Of Christmas, reports that in “in a famous letter to Augustine, Pope Gregory directed [him] to accommodate the ceremonies of the Christian worship as much as to those of the heathen, that the people might not be startled at the change, and in particular, the Pope advised Augustine to allow coverts to kill and eat at the Christmas festival a great number of oxen to the glory of God, as they had formerly done to the Devil!”  Indeed, this papal directive to marry pagan practices with Christian worship was a very strong pollutant, the fruits of which the unwary have embraced today to the damnation of their souls.
 
But nobody would be excused because the Bible is there as the most authoritative guide to salvation and worship of God.  Moreover, history books are replete with accounts that the same excessive revelling and drunkenness that marked the feast of the SUN god on December 25 long before Christ was born in Bethlehem are exactly the same unedifying preoccupations that dominate the celebration of Christmas today.  Certainly, there is no way Christ can be associated with it. 
 
Barbara Aho, in her article, “Cosmic Christmas: Rebirth of the Sun God,” says: “In the fourth century, the Emperor Constantine designated December 25, the birthday of the Roman Sun-god Mithra, as the birthday of Jesus Christ, thereby placing the true Savior among the pantheon of Roman gods. Constantine succeeded in drawing Christians into the pagan celebrations of Rome, which procured the religious unity needed for the success of the Holy Roman Empire. The empire dominated the world for 1,200 years until the 16th century, when the Protestant Reformers led 2/3 of Europe to break away with the Roman Catholic Church and discontinued the celebration of Christmas by reason of its pagan character. The Puritans who controlled the English Parliament in 1644 declared that no observation of Christmas was permitted, calling it ‘The Profane Man’s Ranting Day.’”
 
Also, the famous English preacher, C.H. Spurgeon, had this to say as recently as 1871: “We have no superstitious regard for times and seasons. Certainly, we do not believe in the present ecclesiastical arrangement called Christmas.”
 
On December 23, 1983, USA Today’ newspaper reported that “A broad element of English Christianity still considered Christmas celebration a pagan blasphemy. The Puritans, Baptists, Quakers, Presbyterians, Calvinists and other denominations brought this opposition to early New England and strong opposition to the holiday lasted in America until the middle of the 18th century.”
 
Indeed, it was when depreciation and compromise began to set in that people whose forbears had opposed this heathen feast began to return to it. But it was not only Christmas that the depreciation brought. Of recent, for instance, some pastors of some so-called Bible-believing Churches have begun to don priestly robes, complete with skullcaps and the mitre! Just for them to be addressed as Bishops! What a horrible period of great apostasy! (Matthew 24:12).
 
Truth is: Christmas has no Scriptural backing. The Apostles did not observe it. It is a product of a most hideous compromise. Indeed, no matter the good intentions that led to this unholy marriage that produced Christmas, it is still a heathen feast, in honour of the devil.
 
When Aaron made the golden calf for the Israelites at Mount Sinai, he had still proclaimed the celebration that attended its inauguration the “feast of the Lord.” (Exodus 32:5). Yet, this did not prevent the wrath of God from falling upon them. The name Jeroboam, the son of the Nebat, is always accompanied with the statement, “the man who made Israel to sin,” each time it is mentioned in the Bible. The Bible said he had “ordained a feast in the eight month… like unto the feast in Judah…” (I Kings 12: 32), when he wanted to prevent the Israelites from rebelling against his kingship. An entry in the famous Matthew Henry’s Commentary states: “Though it is probable [Jeroboam] meant this worship for Jehovah the God of Israel, it was directly contrary to the Divine majesty, to be thus represented.”
 
A historical record observed that “the point of departure for every major apostasy in Israel and Christendom involved the commingling of worship of the true God with worship of the Sun-god.” In fact, Aaron’s golden calf and King Jeroboam’s pagan worship have all been proved to be in honour of the Sun-god. Just as Christmas is! And God’s attitude towards them can only be the same.
 
A Scottish writer was right when he said: “Christmas is still a pagan festival through and through. Its change of name from Saturnalia, the birthday of the Sun god, to Christ’s Mass [Christmas] has not altered its true character one iota: and the evil spirit behind its celebrations still produces the deception, debt, drunkenness, misrule and licentiousness that characterized the pagan revelries of bygone days.”  Indeed, all other accompaniments like Christmas tree, Christmas log, exchange of gifts, etc., are direct carry-overs from the celebration of the birthday of the Sun-god as history reports it.
 
But the question is: do we even need to commemorate the birth of the Saviour to obtain salvation? The answer is obvious, and it is NO!
 
Again, could Christ have been born on December 25? Well, there was just no way those shepherds the angels met on the day He was born could have been “in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night” (Luke 2:8) in the killing cold of winter.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

scruples2006@yahoo.com

www.ugochukwu.wordpress.com

Thursday, 08 January 2008

Posted by Ugochukwu Ejinkeonye at 20:45:07 | Permanent Link | Comments (1) |